辩工性格

ENTP-A / ENTP-T
(有什么不同?)

介绍

谁是辩论(ENTP)?

一种辩论(ENTP)是一个人外向直觉的思维, 和勘探人格特质。他们倾向于具有巨大精神敏捷性的大胆和创造性,解构,解构和重建思想。尽管他们可能会遇到任何阻力,但他们仍在努力追求目标。

没有人喜欢精神争吵的过程,而不是争议的人格类型,因为它使他们有机会行使他们毫不费力地快速的机智,广泛的积累知识库以及连接不同想法来证明他们的积分的能力。辩护人是终极魔鬼的倡导者,茁壮成长,茁壮成长粉碎争论和信仰,让丝带在风中漂移到所有人。但是,他们并不总是这样做,因为他们正在努力实现一些更深层次的目的或战略目标。有时它是为了乐趣的简单原因。

争论者出现了一个奇怪的并置,因为它们是毫不妥协的诚实,但会因为他们实际上不相信的东西而孜孜不倦地争辩,踩到另一个人的鞋子,从另一个角度来争论真相。

扮演魔鬼的倡导者帮助人们与争议的人格类型不仅能够培养更好的别人的推理,而是更好地了解反对意见 - 因为辩论者是争论他们的辩论。

This tactic shouldn’t be confused with the sort of mutual understanding Diplomat personalities seek – Debaters, like all Analyst personality types, are on a constant quest for knowledge, and what better way to gain it than to attack and defend an idea, from every angle, from every side?

辩论(ENTP)个性

这里没有规则 - 我们正在努力完成一些事情!

遵循不安全的独立思想家的路径。将您的想法暴露于争议的危险之中。说出你的思想,恐惧少于“裂缝罐”的标签而不是符合耻辱。在对您来说似乎非常重要的问题上,站起来并按任何成本计算。

托马斯J. Watson

在成为弱者中,辩护人享受着询问历安的思想模式的精神锻炼,使它们在重新加工现有系统或摇动并将其推动并以巧妙的新方向推动它们。但是,他们将悲惨地管理实际实施建议的日常机制。辩护人的人士喜欢头脑风暴并思考大,但他们将避免在所有费用中抓住“咕噜咕噜”。辩护人只占了人口的三个百分之三,这就是正确的,因为它让他们创造了原创想法,然后回来让更多众多和严谨的个性地处理实施和维护的物流。

辩工s’ capacity for debate can be a vexing one – while often appreciated when it’s called for, it can fall painfully flat when they step on others’ toes by say, openly questioning their boss in a meeting, or picking apart everything their significant other says. This is further complicated by Debaters’ unyielding honesty, as this type doesn’t mince words and cares little about being seen as sensitive or compassionate. Likeminded types get along well enough with people with the Debater personality type, but more sensitive types, and society in general, are often conflict-averse, preferring feelings, comfort, and even white lies over unpleasant truths and hard rationality.

这令人沮丧的辩论者,他们发现他们的争吵乐趣燃烧了许多桥梁,因为他们通过别人犁了他们的信仰而被认为是挑剔的,他们的感情掠过。当他们受到对待时,对待他人,辩论者对被抄写的宽容很少,并且当人们在灌木丛中击败时,不喜欢,特别是在提出青睐时。辩护人的人士发现自己尊重他们的愿景,信心,知识和热衷于幽默感,但往往努力利用这些品质作为更深层次的友谊和浪漫关系的基础。

错过机会,因为它看起来像努力工作

辩工s have a longer road than most in harnessing their natural abilities – their intellectual independence and free-form vision are tremendously valuable when they’re in charge, or at least have the ear of someone who is, but getting there can take a level of follow-through that Debaters struggle with.

Once they’ve secured such a position, Debaters need to remember that for their ideas to come to fruition, they will always depend on others to assemble the pieces – if they’ve spent more time “winning” arguments than they have building consensus, many Debaters will find they simply don’t have the support necessary to be successful. Playing devil’s advocate so well, people with this personality type may find that the most complex and rewarding intellectual challenge is to understand a more sentimental perspective, and to argue consideration and compromise alongside logic and progress.

01.

您可能知道的辩护人

Facebook
其他的建议(127)

还不是会员?通过拍我们的方式创建免费档案opebet体育·电竞赛事 或者输入您的结果你自己。